Legislative Testimony for LB88: Provide an income tax credit for certain purchases of a residence
Good afternoon, members of the Revenue Committee. I am here to speak briefly in a neutral capacity on an income tax credit for homes purchased in extremely blighted areas if used as a primary residence.
This is an important discussion to have as the committee considers how to address property tax reform this year.
The Platte Institute’s intent is not to weigh in on the individual merits of this proposed tax expenditure. Instead, our goal is to encourage lawmakers to consider how to properly structure Nebraska’s tax code to reduce the demand for tax expenditures, as well as to limit and prioritize the use of tax expenditures.
Because it is far easier to adopt credits, deductions, and exemptions that appear small than it is to enact broad-based tax reforms, past Revenue Committees have been much more inclined to use these policies, which target specific groups or sectors of the economy.
However, while tax expenditures often lower tax costs for specific goods and services, the cost of these tax breaks is then borne by other, non-favored goods and services which bear a correspondingly higher tax burden.
Of course, all states will fall short of an economically ideal tax code in some way. Many tax expenditures are popular despite the fact that they contribute to higher tax rates that taxpayers also dislike.
In general, our advice on tax expenditures would be the same as regulatory red tape or job licensing: members of the Legislature should be reviewing these policies, which the Department of Revenue includes in its Tax Expenditure Report, and working toward a system with fewer barriers for everyone.
Many governments now require a slimming-down of regulatory codes, where several ineffective regulations are repealed as new regulations are adopted. It would benefit the state in the long-term to adopt a similar attitude to tax expenditures. By eliminating inefficient tax expenditures where possible, the savings can be used to make improvements to the overall tax code.
We make the assumption that along the way, some tax expenditures are going to be adopted for one reason or another. And under those circumstances, it’s even more important to prioritize and discard some expenditures if the committee believes a new one is really valuable for the state to have.
The best way to determine which tax expenditures truly add value is to consider their economic or public policy rationale.
For example, the sales tax exemption for business inputs is understood by economists from all viewpoints to be a positive feature for an efficient tax code.
If providing this tax credit is more efficient then the current policy for developing blighted areas, then this policy is worth considering. Because we could not find any evidence from this sort of tax credit in other states, we have no supporting evidence of this which is why we are testifying in the neutral capacity.